Implications of Apparatus Performance Assessment Model on the Quality of Public Services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36636/dialektika.v1i1.18Abstract
The purpose of this research is to find a public service performance appraisal model in order to improve the excellent and sustainable quality of public services from the aspects of service policy and service benefits for the community as users. The research design was carried out by surveying the research object, then conducting in-depth interviews to be analyzed in relation to the assessment of the performance of services that have been running to determine the feasibility of the research object. Diagnostic results are used as a sample for periodic testing through Focus Group Discussion (FGD) to produce performance appraisal instrument formulations and produce an assumptive model for service performance assessment. Implementation of performance appraisal using SKP is still running for 1 (one) year effectively, so it still requires adjustments and adaptations for employees in making SKP. The assessment process using SKP also requires assistance from superiors so that filling out SKP goes well. Each employee is required to fill out an SKP in which there is an assessment that must be filled in by each employee using a self-assessment system. The SKP assessment is also an obstacle for lower middle class employees who have to fill in the assessment independently, this is related to the level of education and the ability of employees to fill it out. Understanding of the rules and regulations for filling out SKP also makes it difficult for leaders to recapitulate the results of employee scores. This also has an impact on the performance of the leadership if the employee's SKP value is not balanced. So that there is still a thread that has not been unraveled in the performance appraisal policy using SKP which is considered to be less substantive. Fundamentally, performance evaluation must be proportional to the output produced by public service personnel in providing services to the community. Performance appraisal must be an indicator of quality public service processes. Good apparatus performance must have an impact on excellent service, so that it is integrated with the government's goals in the context of building bureaucratic reform to achieve good government.
Downloads
References
Brog. W & Gall. 1989. Educational Research Introduction. New York.
Direktorat Aparatur Negara Kementrian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/ BAPPENAS. 2010. Kajian Manajemen Pengaduan Masyarakat Dalam Pelayanan Publik. Jakarta: BAPPENAS.
Dwiyanto, Agus, et. al. Kinerja Tata Pemerintahan Daerah di Indonesia(Governance Assesment Survei 2006). Yogyakarta: PSKK (2007)
Lembaga Administrasi Negara. 2007. Kajian Model Penilaian Kinerja Pelayanan Publik. Jakarta: Lembaga Administrasi Negara
Peraturan Kepala Badan Kepegawaian Negara Nomor 1 Tahun 2013 tentang Ketentuan Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 46 tahun 2011 tentang Penilaian Prestasi Kerja PNS.
Peraturan Menpan Nomor 20/M.PAN/2006 Tentang Pedoman Penyusunan Standar Pelayanan Publi. Menteri Pemberdayaan Aparatur Negara.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomo 46 tahun 2011 tentang Penilaian Prestasi Kerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil.
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 Tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara
Undang-Undang Nomor: 8/1974 Jo. UU No. 43/1999 Tentang Pokok-Pokok Kepegawaian
www.kpk.go.id. di akses 16/9/2013
Pusat Kajian Kinerja Otonomi Daerah. 2012. Pengukuran dan Evaluasi kinerja manajemen PNS di daerah. Info Kajian Lembaga Administrasi Negara, Vol. 6 No. 1. 59-75
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Hayat Hayat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.