Local Community Resistance to Geothermal Projects in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36636/jogiv.v8i1.9121Kata Kunci:
Geotermal, Resistensi, Keadilan Lingkungan, Masyarakat LokalAbstrak
Penelitian ini berupaya untuk memberikan perspektif yang lebih luas mengenai pengembangan geotermal di Indonesia, penolakan masyarakat terhadap proyek bukan hanya sekadar reaksi emosional, tetapi juga merupakan panggilan untuk memperhatikan hak dan kebutuhan mereka yang terabaikan. penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami secara lebih komprehensif bagaimana praktik implementasi, dan kondisi sosial setempat membentuk dinamika penerimaan maupun penolakan terhadap proyek geotermal di Indonesia. Peneliti memanfaatkan metode Systematic Literature Review (SLR) untuk mengkaji berbagai sumber ilmiah secara terstruktur dan menyeluruh. Mengacu pada panduan Kitchenham (2015), SLR dilakukan melalui tiga tahap utama; perencanaan, pelaksanaan, dan pelaporan. Metode ini dilakukan secara sistematis melalui software Covidence dengan sumber data utama SCOPUS dan Crossreff. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa resistensi terhadap proyek energi geotermal di Indonesia berakar pada pandangan sumber daya alam sebagai komoditas strategis sehingga tata kelola bersifat sentralistik dan top-down. Menempatkan negara dan korporasi sebagai aktor utama serta meminggirkan partisipasi masyarakat lokal. Studi kasus seperti Salingka Gunung Talang, Padarincang, dan Desa Waplasit memperlihatkan ironi sosial-ekologis bahwa proyek yang diklaim berkelanjutan menimbulkan pemiskinan baru, relokasi, kerentanan kesehatan, disintegrasi sosial, serta pengabaian nilai kultural masyarakat adat.
Referensi
Books
Bullard, R. D. (1993). Environmental justice for all.
Bullard, R. D. (2008). Environmental Justice In The 21 St Century. In environtmental justice resource center.
Kitchenham, B. (2007). “Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in SE”, Kitchenham et al Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering.
Kitchenham, B. (2015). Evidence Based Software Engineering And Systematic Reviews. A Chapman & Hall Book. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b19467
Journal article
Alam, A. S., Nurjaya, N., Taufiq, R., Jatmika, D., Zikri, F., & Lestari, H. S. (2023). Focus Grup Discussion Pembangunan Pembangkit Tenaga Listrik Panas Bumi Dalam Memenuhi Kebutuhan Masyarakat Focus Group Discussion On Geothermal Power Plant Development In Meeting Community Needs. Journal Of EMPOWERMENT, 4(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.35194/je.v4i1.3450
Albab, W. (2023). Kajian Terhadap Pembangunan Geotermal Di Pulau Flores Berdasarkan Prespektif Teori Keadilan (John Rawls). Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 1, No. 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v1i4.1760
Azhar, M., & Adam Satriawan, D. (2018). Implementasi Kebijakan Energi Baru dan Energi Terbarukan Dalam Rangka Ketahanan Energi Nasional. In Online Administrative Law & Governance Journal (Vol. 1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v1i4.398-412
Ermawati, Y., Yulistia, E., & Zulyanti, F. (2022a). Potensi Panas Bumi sebagai Energi Alternatif dalam Mewujudkan Indonesia Bebas Emisi Karbon Geothermal Potential as An Alternative Energy in Realizing Carbon Emission-Free Indonesia. In UEEJ-Unbara Environmental Engineering Journal (Vol. 02).
Fahmi, I., Gunawan Afandi, F., Sasongko, N. A., & Yoesgiantoro, D. (2022a). Peran Teknologi Pada Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Geothermal Guna Mendukung Tercapainya Net Zero Emission (NZE). Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 6(2).
Fandari, A. (2014). Pengembangan Energi Panas Bumi yang Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Ilmiah Semesta Teknika, Vol. 17, No. 1, 68–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/st.v17i1.412
Febriano, O., Wagur, N., Ambun, O. F., Tukan, P. B., & Mirsel, R. (2024). Implikasi Sosial-Moral Dari Mekanisme Pengambinghitaman: Studi Kasus Proyek Geotermal Di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Terpadu, 8(12).
Jatnika, J., & Amal, M. I. (2023). Tantangan Implementasi Net Zero Emission di Banten: Studi Kasus Pembangunan Geothermal Padarincang (Vol. 5, Issue 4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.37950/ijd.v5i4.433
Mazaya, A. (2022). Collaborative Governance Pemanfaatan Energi Panas Bumi Sebagai Sumber Pembangkit Listrik (Studi Kasus Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Panas Bumi Dieng, Jawa Tengah). Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 3.
Mustika P., Anindya Putri, R., & Drajat Pradika, F. (2024). Resistensi Perempuan: Studi Perlawanan Kelompok Perempuan (GERAPAS) Terhadap Pembangunan PLTB Padarincang. In Journal of Citizenship (Vol. 3, Issue 1). http://hk-publishing.id/joc
Nakzim, O. :, Siddiq, K., Ade Mulada, D., & Rahman, A. (n.d.). Penerapan Konsep ESG dalam Regulasi dan Praktik Hukum di Sektor Energi.
Prabowo, C. (2020). Resentralisasi Dalam Pembagian Kewenangan Pemanfaatan Energi Panas Bumi. http://www.datacon.co.id/Listrik-
Rivaldus, A. K. Sinring. (2024). Konflik Sosial Antara Masyarakat Wae Sanodan Pemerintah Kabupaten Manggarai Barat Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur (Studi Kontradiksi PT. Geo Dipa Energi Tambang Panas Bumi Geothermal ). Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 2(1), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62017/arima.v2i1.1442
Salma, Z. (2020). Keunggulan, Tantangan, dan Rekomendasi Kebijakan akan Pengembangan Energi Panas Bumi di Indonesia. Jurnal Nasional Pengelolaan Energi, Volume 2 No 2, 31–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37525/mz/2020-2/263
Sari, Y. (2021). Gerakan Perempuan Salingka Gunung Talang dalam Menolak Pembangunan Geothermal di Kabupaten Solok. Jurnal Tanah Pilih, VOL. 1 NO. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30631/tpj.v1i1.674
Sauni, H. (2022). Energi Geothermal Dalam Aturan, Masalah Lingkungan Hidup Dan Solusi Penyelesaian Konflik Di Masyarakat (Geothermal Energy In Rules, Environmental Problems And Community Conflict Solutions). Jurnal Rechtvinding, 11(3).
Andalucia, S. & Wibowo, R. (2023). Downhole Monitoring Sumur
Geothermal Dengan Metode Pressure Temperature Shut-In Sumur Sr 1#2 Di Pt Pertamina Geothermal Energy Area Lumut Balai. In JCI Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah (Vol. 3, Issue 4). http://bajangjournal.com/index.php/JCI
Steisi A. (2020). Kajian Pembebasan Lahan Oleh Pt. Pertamina Gheotermal Energy Terhadap Nilai Lahan Di Desa Tonsewer Selatan Kecamatan Tompaso Barat. Agri-Sosio Ekonomi Unsrat, Volume 16 Nomor 2, 197–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35791/agrsosek.16.2.2020.28747
Suryono, A. (2024). Penggunaan Kawasan Hutan Untuk Kepentingan Pengusahaan Panas Bumi Tidak Langsung: Telaah Aliran Hukum Alam. Jurnal Yustisiabel, Volume 8 Nomor 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32529/yustisiabel.v8i1.2979
Journal article with DOI
Abdi, A., Murayama, T., Nishikizawa, S., & Suwanteep, K. (2024). Social acceptance and associated risks of geothermal energy development in East Africa: perspectives from geothermal energy developers. Clean Energy, 8(5), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkae051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkae051
Anggreta, D. K., Somantri, G. R., & Purwanto, S. A. (2022). Social Acceptance: Mapping the Perspectives of Stakeholder in the Development of Geothermal Power Plants in West Sumatra, Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 17(4), 1053–1065. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.170402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.170402
Cantor, A., & Knuth, S. (2019). Speculations on the postnatural: Restoration, accumulation, and sacrifice at the Salton Sea. Environment and Planning A, 51(2), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18796510 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18796510
Dinan, U. H., & Hidayati, N. (2023). Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Eksploitasi Panas Bumi Di Wilayah Kerja Pertambangan Kaldera Rawa Danau. Jurnal Kommunity Online, 2(2), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.15408/jko.v2i2.28278 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jko.v2i2.28278
Dowd, A. M., Boughen, N., Ashworth, P., & Carr-Cornish, S. (2011). Geothermal technology in Australia: Investigating social acceptance. Energy Policy, 39(10), 6301–6307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.029
Fuentes, I. F., Barich, A., Baisch, C., Bodo, B., Elíasson, O., Falcone, G., Friederichs, G., Gregorio, M. de, Hildebrand, J., Ioannou, A., Medgyes, T., Miklovicz, T., Pérez, P., & Pinto, M. T. (2022). The Crowdthermal Project: Creating Public Acceptance Of Geothermal Energy And Opportunities For Community Financing. Energies, 15(21), 8310. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15218310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15218310
Hall, N., Lacey, J., Carr-Cornish, S., & Dowd, A. M. (2015). Social licence to operate: Understanding how a concept has been translated into practice in energy industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86, 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.020
Hakim, A. Sholihah, F., Ismawati, R., & Nuryunita Dewantari. (2022). Potensi dan Pemanfaatan Energi Panas Bumi di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Conservation, 11(2), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijc.v11i2.40599
Herawan, S. (2022). Energi Geothermal Dalam Aturan, Masalah Lingkungan Hidup Dan Solusi Penyelesaian Konflik Di Masyarakat (Geothermal Energy In Rules, Environmental Problems And Community Conflict Solutions). Jurnal Rechtvinding, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12650 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12650
Higgins, M. E., Burnett, D. B., Kreuter, U., & Haut, R. C. (2017). Pre-development research to understand stakeholder perceptions of energy development in environmentally sensitive areas. SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference 2017. https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2017-2664562 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2017-2664562
Hughes, L., & Rogei, D. (2020). Feeling the heat: responses to geothermal development in Kenya’s Rift Valley. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 14(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2020.1716292 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2020.1716292
Ibrohim, A., Prasetyo, R. M., & Rekinagara, I. H. (2019). Understanding Social Acceptance of Geothermal Energy: A Case Study from Mt. Lawu, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 254(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/254/1/012009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/254/1/012009
Isa, M., Zulfadhli, Z., Thahul, C. F., & Cesarian, D. P. (2022). Geothermal Distribution Analysis of Geureudong Volcano Based On Satellite Data and Fault Fracture Density (FFD). Elkawnie, 7(2), 354. https://doi.org/10.22373/ekw.v7i2.9728 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22373/ekw.v7i2.9728
Kamana, N., & Vaughan, M. (2024). Improving collaboration between native Hawaiians and energy professionals to explore geothermal energy potential in Hawai‘i. Frontiers in Sustainability, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2024.1443407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2024.1443407
Kong’ani, L. N. S., Wahome, R. G., & Thenya, T. (2021). Variety and management of developmental conflicts: the case of the Olkaria IV geothermal energy project in Kenya. Conflict, Security and Development, 21(6), 781–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2021.2000806 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2021.2000806
Lu, H., Song, H., & McComas, K. (2021). Seeking information about enhanced geothermal systems: The role of fairness, uncertainty, systematic processing, and information engagement intentions. Renewable Energy, 169, 855–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.031
Mahdi, Z. (n.d.). Perlawanan Masyarakat terhadap Pembangunan Geothermal di Kawasan Dieng Community Resistance to Geothermal Development in the Dieng Area. Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Administrasi Publik, 6(2), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.31289/strukturasi.v6i2.5001
Meller, C., Schill, E., Bremer, J., Kolditz, O., Bleicher, A., Benighaus, C., Chavot, P., Gross, M., Pellizzone, A., Renn, O., Schilling, F., & Kohl, T. (2018). Acceptability of geothermal installations: A geoethical concept for GeoLaB. Geothermics, 73, 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.07.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.07.008
Ezeh, M. Adindu Donatus Ogbu, Augusta Heavens Ikevuje, & Emmanuel Paul-Emeka George. (2024). Stakeholder engagement and influence: Strategies for successful energy projects. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 6(7), 2375–2395. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v6i7.1330 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v6i7.1330
Muslihudin, M., Santosa, I., Tugiyanti, E., Suyono, Dewi, P. S., & Santoso, J. (2023). The Urgency of Social Aspects in Environmental Assessment: A Case Study of a Sustainable Geothermal Power Plant Development in Banyumas, Indonesia. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 79(2), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.79.2.33331 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.79.2.33331
Nurwahyudin, D. S., & Harmoko, U. (2020). Pemanfaatan dan Arah Kebijakan Perencanaan Energi Panas Bumi di Indonesia Sebagai Keberlanjutan Maksimalisasi Energi Baru Terbarukan. Jurnal Energi Baru Dan Terbarukan, 1(3), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.14710/jebt.2020.10032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jebt.2020.10032
Nwaiwu, U., Leach, M., Liu, L., & Seymour, V. (2025). Decentralized Geothermal Energy for Electricity Access: Exploring Knowledge and Social Acceptance in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125455 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125455
Özen, H. (2025). Smallholder women rising: Intersectional dynamics of resistance to geothermal energy in Western Turkey. Energy Research and Social Science, 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103884 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103884
Ruef, F., Stauffacher, M., & Ejderyan, O. (2020). Blind spots of participation: How differently do geothermal energy managers and residents understand participation? Energy Reports, 6, 1950–1962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.07.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.07.003
Sætórsdóttir, A. D., & Hall, C. M. (2019). Contested development paths and rural communities: Sustainable energy or sustainable tourism in Iceland? Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133642 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133642
Sari, N. (2024). Ratio Legis Hak Sipil Dalam Masyarakat Hukum Adat. UNES Law Review. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4
Setyono, A. E., & Kiono, B. F. T. (2021). Dari Energi Fosil Menuju Energi Terbarukan: Potret Kondisi Minyak dan Gas Bumi Indonesia Tahun 2020 – 2050. Jurnal Energi Baru Dan Terbarukan, 2(3), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.14710/jebt.2021.11157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jebt.2021.11157
Soltani, M., Kashkooli, F. M., Souri, M., Rafiei, B., Jabarifar, M., Gharali, K., & Nathwani, J. S. (2021). Environmental, economic, and social impacts of geothermal energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 140, 110750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110750
Utomo, S., Siswadi, S., & Christina Sitotrus, A. P. M. (2025). Konflik Agraria, Sustainability dan Sosio-Ekonomi: Partisipasi Petani Sawit Mandiri Terhadap Implementasi ISPO di Kecamatan Terentang Kabupaten Kubu Raya. Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities, 8(4), 7469–7478. https://doi.org/10.24815/jr.v8i4.50430 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jr.v8i4.50430
Wea, A. N., Sayrani, L. P., & Lopo, Y. H. L. (2024). Kuasa Eksklusi dalam Pembangunan Geothermal di Desa Ulubelu, Kecamatan Golewa, Kabupaten Ngada. 2(4), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.61132/sadewa.v2i3.1296 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61132/sadewa.v2i4.1296
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Davina Putri Hanum, Yeby
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author who wishes to publish articles in this journal agree with the following conditions:
- Author retains the copyright and simultaneously provides the journal the first publishing rights of the manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an initial job writing and publishing statement in this journal.
- The author can include in separate additional contractual arrangements for the rich version of non-exclusive distribution of journal publications (eg posting it to the institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with recognition of publishing initially in this journal.
- The author is permitted and encouraged to post their work online (for example: in the institutional repository or on their website) before and during the submission process because it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and more powerful citations of published works. (See open access policy).
