Analisis Tematik Kebijakan Pengelolaan Sampah Berbasis Partisipatif Menuju Ekonomi Sirkular di Kota Malang

Mustika Anggraeni

doi:10.70609/icom.v5i1.6477

Authors

Mustika Anggraeni Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70609/icom.v5i1.6477

Keywords:

participatory waste management, circular economy, policy framework, thematic analysis

Abstract

The literature closely links the concepts of participatory waste management (PSP) and circular economy (SE). SE in waste management aims to reduce waste, increase resource efficiency, and create a closed cycle for waste management, that need PSP. A clear policy framework is necessary to achieve it. Problem formulations of this research; the current waste policy framework's application, the extent of PSP and EM concepts in the policy framework, and (c) the implementation and the recommendations for these concepts in Malang City waste policy. This study employs the qualitative data analysis method to analyse waste management policy documents, focusing on thematic analysis. The evolution of policies in Malang City is more dynamic compared to the national level, particularly in adapting to rapidly changing conditions related to existing waste generation. While, the PSP-ES concept receives limited accommodation, where waste management still implements end-of-pipe practices, despite the government’s effort to implement 3R.

References

Arnstein, S.R. (1969) A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216-224

Kalra, N. (2020). Community Participation and Waste Management. In: Ghosh, S. (eds) Sustainable Waste Management: Policies and Case Studies. Springer, Singapore.

Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (Third ed.): Sage

Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

Stahel, W. R. (2020). History of the circular economy. The historic development of circularity and the circular economy. The Circular Economy in the European Union: An Interim Review, 7-19.

Katsarski, N. (2022). 1. Conceptual economic indicators in the circular economy. doi: 10.5593/sgem2022/5.1/s21.068

Kemenko PMK (2024) “7,2 Juta Ton Sampah di Indonesia Belum Terkelola Dengan Baik“ https://www.kemenkopmk.go.id/72-juta-ton-sampah-di-indonesia-belum-terkelola-dengan-baik. (diakses pada tanggal 1 Desember 2024).

Harian Bisnis (2024) “Produksi Sampah di Kota Malang“ https://surabaya.bisnis.com/read/20240905/531/1797328/produksi-sampah-di-kota-malang-tembus-77838-tonhari? (diakses pada tanggal 1 Desember 2024).

Lazaro. L, Forti, L. Thomaz. (2021). 2. Stakeholder participation in the formulation of Brazilian biofuel policy (RenovaBio). Ambiente & Sociedade, doi: 10.1590/1809-4422ASOC20200056R2VU2021L4DE

Al-Thani, G. (2024). 3. Comparative Analysis of Stakeholder Integration in Education Policy Making: Case Studies of Singapore and Finland. Societies, doi: 10.3390/soc14070104

Peter., L, Clausen, W., Foss, O., Hansen, H., Bang, N., Kristian., O, Steffen S., Hansen, F. (2020). 4. Stakeholder analysis with regard to a recent European restriction proposal on microplastics. PLOS ONE, doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0235062

Potkány. M., Neykov, N., Streimikis. J, Lesníková, P. (2024). 1. Circular economy efficiency in the context of waste management in the selected Central and Eastern European countries – evidence from DEA and fractional regression analysis. doi: 10.14254/2071-789x.2024/17-3/10

Potting J, Hekkert M, Worrell E, et al. (2017) Circular Economy: Measuring Innovation in the Product Chain. The Hague: PBL – Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.

Škare. M., Gavurova, B., Kováč, V. (2023). 5. Investigation of selected key indicators of circular economy for implementation processes in sectorial dimensions. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2023.100421

Chen. C., and Chang, Y. (2024). 3. Leveraging Circular Economy Metrics for Data-Driven Forecasting of Solid Waste Production in Europe. Sustainability, doi: 10.3390/su16031017

Werkheiser, I. (2016). 5. Community Epistemic Capacity. Social Epistemology, doi: 10.1080/02691728.2014.971911

Wilson DC (1996) Stick or carrot?: The use of policy measures to move waste management up the hierarchy. Waste Management & Research 14: 385–398.

Dutta. R, Jeetasha. J., Jit. H., Deepti., K, Kaur, P., Malhotra., P. (2023). 4. Sort-O-Matic: An efficient Waste Segregation System for Sustainable Waste Management. doi: 10.1109/icdabi60145.2023.10629584

Manickam. P, Duraisamy. G, (2019). 4 - 3Rs and circular economy, Editor(s): Subramanian Senthilkannan Muthu, In The Textile Institute Book Series, Circular Economy in Textiles and Apparel, Woodhead Publishing. 77-93.

Gutberlet. J (2023). A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050) https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability/special_issues/Community_Participatory_Waste_Management_Recycling (diakses pada 23 Novenber 2024).

Verawati, P. (2021). Kritik Ekologi Mendalam terhadap Regulasi Persampahan di Indonesia. Jurnal Meta-Yuridis, 4(2).

Milios, L. (2016) Policies for Resource Efficient and Effective Solutions. International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics at Lund University.

Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis. SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781

Times Indonesia (2024), https://timesindonesia.co.id/peristiwa-daerah/468059/viral-sungai-di-kota-malang-penuh-sampah-warga-ikan-mati-bau-menyengat (diakses pada tanggal 1 Desember 2024).