Berbagi Ruang Omotenashi berdasarkan Aspek Kekeluargaan dan Kehangatan di Kawasan Jam Gadang Bukittinggi

Imma Widyawati  Agustin; Fanny  Safitri; Septiana Hariyani

doi:10.70609/icom.v5i1.6737

Penulis

Imma Widyawati Agustin Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Fanny Safitri Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Septiana Hariyani Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70609/icom.v5i1.6737

Kata Kunci:

Berbagi Ruang, Omotenashi, Kehangatan, Kekeluargaan, Bukittinggi

Abstrak

Jumlah kendaraan pribadi yang meningkat berbanding lurus dengan padatnya lalu lintas yang kemudian menyebabkan sistem transportasi masih difokuskan kepada pelebaran jalan ataupun penyediaan infrastruktur untuk memenuhi volume kendaraan yang terus mengalami peningkatan. Disisi lain penambahan jalan ataupun pelebaran jalur tidaklah dianggap efektif dalam penyelenggaraan sistem transportasi hal ini dikarenakan pelebaran jalan hanya akan meningkatkan jumlah kendaraan yang melaju dan bukannya mengurangi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyusun desain berbagi ruang yang dapat diterapkan pada Kawasan Jam Gadang sebagai ruang publik menjadi lebih aktif, memperkuat interaksi sosial, lebih adil bagi semua pengguna. Analisis yang digunakan adalah Quality Function Deployment (QFD) dan 6 tahapan analisis dalam berbagi ruang. Hasil akhir penelitian menunjukkan jika memberikan desain berbagi ruang yang dipilih oleh pejalan kaki adalah dengan model jalan dan trotoar dengan perkerasan paving dan tanpa pembatas antara pejalan kaki dan pengguna kendaraan, sedangkan pengguna kendaraan memilih desain berbagi ruang dengan perkerasan jalan menggunakan aspal dan perkerasan trotoar menggunakan paving.

Referensi

Agustin, I. W. (2020a). Berbagi Ruang Untuk mewujudkan Keadilan Bagi pengguna Jalan. Malang: AE Media Grafika.

Agustin, I. W. (2020b). Transportation Demand Omotenashi VS Transportation Demand Management. Malang, Jawa Timur: AE Media Grafika.

Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Bukittinggi, 2022. https://bukittinggikota.bps.go.id/id/publication/2022/02/25/9a0d2867ca7e2540d3360eec/kota-bukittinggi-dalam-angka-2022.html

Barr, S., Lampkin, S., Dawkins, L., Williamson, D., 2021. Shared space: Negotiating sites of (un)sustainable mobility. Geoforum 127, 283–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.11.012.

Brunekreef, B., 1997. Air pollution and life expectancy: Is there a relation? Occup. Environ. Med. 54 (11), 781–784. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oem.54.11.781.

Beitel, D., Stipancic, J., Manaugh, K., Miranda-Moreno, L., 2018. Assessing safety of shared space using cyclist-pedestrian interactions and automated video conflict analysis. Transp. Res. Part Transp. Environ. 65, 710–724. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.10.001.

Cowan, G., Earl, R., Falkmer, T., Girdler, S., & Morris, S. L. (2018). Fixation patterns of individuals with and without Autism Spectrum Disorder: Do they differ in shared zones and in zebra crossings? Journal of Transport & Health, 8, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.12.001.

DfT, U. K. (2011). Shared space. In (pp. 55-55): Stationery Office.

Duncan, A. B. (2021). Shared Space. In International Encyclopedia of Transportation (pp. 584-592): Elsevier.

Earl, R., Falkmer, T., Girdler, S., Morris, S. L., & Falkmer, M. (2018). Viewpoints of pedestrians with and without cognitive impairment on shared zones and zebra crossings. PLoS One1, 13(9), e0203765.

Earl, R., Morris, S., Girdler, S., Falkmer, T., & Cowan, G. (2019). Research in developmental disabilities visual search strategies in a shared zone in pedestrians with and without intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 94, Article 103493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2019.103493.

Fita, F. H. (2020). Manajemen Transportasi Dinas Perhubungan Kota Bukittinggi. Jurnal Teori dan Praktek Administrasi Publik, 04, 20-25.

Helbing, D., Mahajan, S., Fricker, R.H., Musso, A., Hausladen, C.I., Carissimo, C., Carpentras, D., Stockinger, E., Argota Sanchez-Vaquerizo, J., Yang, J.C., Ballandies, M.C., Korecki, M., Dubey, R.K., Pournaras, E., 2023. Democracy by design: Perspectives for digitally assisted, participatory upgrades of society. J. Comput. Sci. 102061. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2023.102061.

Imrie, R., 2012. Auto-disabilities: The case of shared space environments. Environ. Plan. A 44 (9), 2260–2277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a44595.

Johansson, R., & Ros´en, M. (2011). Attraktiva stadsrum f¨or alla: Shared space [Attractive urban spaces for everyone: Shared space]. Publication number 2010:122. Borl¨ange: Swedish Transport Administration.

Kaparias, I., Bell, M. G. H., Miri, A., Chan, C., & Mount, B. (2012). Analysing the perceptions of pedestrians and drivers to shared space. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, 15, 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.02.001.

Lee, & Kim. (2019). Shared space and pedestrian safety: Empirical evidence from pedestrian priority street projects in Seoul, Korea. Sustainability, 11, 4645-4645.

Moreno, C., Allam, Z., Chabaud, D., Gall, C., & Pratlong, F. (2021). Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, resilience and place identity in future post- pandemic cities. Smart Cities, 4, 93–111.

Nikiforiadis, A., Basbas, S., Mikiki, F., Oikonomou, A., Polymeroudi, E., 2021. Pedestrians-cyclists shared spaces level of service: Comparison of methodologies and critical discussion. Sustainability 13 (1), 361. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13010361.

Reid, S., Kocak, N., & Hunt, L. (2009). DfT Shared space project. Stage 1: Appraisal of shared space. Report for Department of Transport. http://webarchive. nationalarchives.gov.uk/20091204120415/http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/sustainable/sharedspace/stage1/pdf/stage1.pdf.

Ravazzoli, E., Torricelli, G.P., 2017. Urban mobility and public space. A challenge for the sustainable liveable city of the future. J. Public Space 2 (2), 37–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.5204/jps.v2i2.91.

Shaheen, S., 2018. Shared Mobility: The Potential of Ridehailing and Pooling. Springer.

Wall´en Warner, H., Andersson, A., & Patten, C. (2022). Shared space: Different age groups’ perspectives. Transportation Research Part F, 90, 167–180. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.trf.2022.07.009.

Zalewski, A., & Kempa, J. (2019). Traffic calming as a comprehensive solution improving traffic road safety. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 471, Article 062035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/6/062035.