Evaluasi Usability Aplikasi PAK RT Berbasis WebGIS Menggunakan Model Nielsen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70609/jusifor.v4i2.8255Keywords:
sistem informasi geografis, usability test, nielsen modelAbstract
Prajuritkulon District, located in the City of Mojokerto, utilizes an innovative application called PAK RT (Neighborhood Supervision) to collect, display, and map data related to public order and security conditions within the district. The system was initially developed in 2022; however, it did not function effectively and was ultimately not utilized. In 2024, the system underwent a redesign. To evaluate the usability of the redesigned system, this study employed usability testing based on the Nielsen model, which includes Learnability, Efficiency, Memorability, Errors, and Satisfaction. The evaluation followed a series of procedural steps, including scenario-based testing, administration of the Nielsen Attributes of Usability (NAU) questionnaire, and interviews with administrative village operators. The results indicate positive usability outcomes, with scores of 74,93% for Learnability, 66,65% for Efficiency, 83,33% for Memorability, 69,44% for Errors, and 85,89% for Satisfaction. These findings suggest that neighborhood operators are delighted with the features and benefits of the web-based PAK RT application. Consequently, the redesign is considered successful in meeting reporting needs and providing added value to users.
References
[1] Keputusan Walikota Mojokerto Nomor 110 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Peraturan Walikota Nomor 82 Tahun 2021 Tentang Inovasi Daerah.
[2] Keputusan Walikota Mojokerto Nomor 100.3.3.3/440/417.101.3/2023 tentang Penetapan Inovasi Daerah Kota Mojokerto.
[3] Prahasta, E. Sistem Informasi Geografis: Tutorial ArcView. Bandung: CV Informatika, 2002.
[4] Irwansyah, Sistem Informasi Geografis. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia, 2016.
[5] Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G. D., & Beale, R. Human-Computer Interaction. In Human-Computer Interaction: Vol. Third (Issue January). Prentice Hall. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1207/ S15327051HCI16234.
[6] Gray W., Salzman M. Damaged merchandise? A review of experiments that compare usability methods. Human-Computer Interaction,1998. 13, 203–335.
[7] Abdillah, Ubaidi. Evaluasi Usability Aplikasi Mobile AIS UIN Jakarta berdasarkan ISO/IEC 9126 Menggunakan Metode Usability Testing. Skripsi. Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah. 2018.
[8] Nielsen, J. Usability Engineering. United States of America: Academic Press. 1993
[9] Nielsen, J. Usability 101: Introduction to Usability, United States of America: Academic Press. 2012, 3 Januari, diakses pada 14 Agustus 2024, dari https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/
[10] Jacobsen, N. E., Usability Evaluation Methods The Reliability and Usage of Cognitive Walkthrough and Usability Test. University of Copenhagen, Denmark. 1999.
[11] Ali, Muhammad. Metodologi dan Aplikasi Riset Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi. Aksara. 2014.
[12] Santoso, B. N., Yanuarsyah, I., & Kusumah, F. S. F. Interpretasi Citra Satelit Resolusi Tinggi Menggunakan Digitasi On Screen Aset Tanah Pemerintah Kota Bogor Berbasis WebgGIS. Seminar Nasional Geomatika, 3. 2019. https://doi.org/10.24895/sng.2018.3-0.932.
[13] Peraturan Walikota Mojokerto Nomor 117 Tahun 2020 tentang Kedudukan, Susunan Organisasi, Tugas dan Fungsi Serta Tata Kerja Kecamatan.
[14] Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D, Cetakan ke-24. Bandung: Alfabeta. 2016.
[15] Mulyana, Deddy. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Paradigma Baru Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Edisi Revisi, Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. 2020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 S. Candra Hastuti H., Gunadi Gunadi , Ahmad Redha Arissaputra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





