Examining Incumbent Performance Accountability in a Single Candidate Local Election: A Case Study of the 2024 Pangkalpinang Local Election
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36636/jogiv.v8i1.10390Keywords:
performance accountability, Incumbent, single-candidate election, blank ballot, electoral behavior, 2024 Pangkalpinang Local ElectionAbstract
This study examines incumbent performance accountability in the 2024 single-candidate local election in Pangkalpinang City and its influence on electoral outcomes that culminated in the victory of the blank ballot option. Using a qualitative case study approach, the research draws on in-depth interviews, document analysis, media reports, LP3ES survey data (January 2025), and other secondary sources related to local governance and political dynamics. The findings show that the incumbent administration achieved several notable accomplishments, including a significant increase in regional investment realization from IDR 279.5 billion in 2020 to approximately IDR 4.9 trillion in 2024, urban infrastructure development, the construction of the Kubah Timah Grand Mosque, and improvements in employment and governance indicators. Despite these achievements, citizens continued to face persistent challenges in public services, including inadequate public transportation, waste management problems, limited access to clean water, and concerns regarding bureaucratic performance and local economic conditions. Survey results indicate that the victory of the blank ballot option (44.0%) over the sole candidate (38.6%) was driven primarily by perceptions of inadequate political representation, the absence of meaningful electoral alternatives, and negative evaluations of the candidate’s track record. Furthermore, most respondents reported stagnant or worsening household economic conditions. The study concludes that accountability in single-candidate elections is determined not only by development achievements and administrative performance but also by political representation, government responsiveness, and democratic legitimacy.
References
Bouckaert, G., & Van de Walle, S. (2003). Comparing measures of citizen trust and user satisfaction as indicators of “good governance”: Difficulties in linking trust and satisfaction indicators. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69(3), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852303693003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523030693003
Boyne, G. A., James, O., John, P., & Petrovsky, N. (2009). Democracy and government performance: Holding incumbents accountable in English local governments. The Journal of Politics, 71(4), 1273–1284. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609990090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609990089
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Dharma, F., & Martani, D. (2016). Pengaruh kinerja penyelenggaraan pemerintah daerah terhadap keterpilihan kembali kepala daerah. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 13(1), 1–20.
Dovi, S. (2007). The good representative. Blackwell Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754948
Fiorina, M. P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. Yale University Press.
Halil, E. (2025). Dinamika Pilkada Kota Pangkalpinang 2024 dan tantangan menuju pemilihan ulang 2025. LP3ES.
James, O. (2011). Performance measures and democracy. In M. Bevir (Ed.), The Sage handbook of governance (pp. 456–470). Sage.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Stegmaier, M. (2007). Economic models of voting. In R. J. Dalton & H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 518–537). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.003.0027
LP3ES. (2025). Lanskap politik Kota Pangkalpinang menjelang pemilihan ulang Pilkada 2025: Perspektif publik [Hasil survei]. Lembaga Penelitian, Pendidikan, Penerangan Ekonomi dan Sosial.
Mansbridge, J. (2003). Rethinking representation. American Political Science Review, 97(4), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000856 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000856
Megawandi, Y. (2025). Permasalahan Kota Pangkalpinang dan tantangannya [Bahan presentasi]. Dialog Publik: Lansekap Politik Kota Pangkalpinang Jelang Pilkada Ulang Tahun 2025.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
Mietzner, M. (2024). Reformasi reversal: Structural drivers of democratic decline in Jokowi’s middle-income Indonesia. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 78(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2023.2286020
Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973383
Otjes, S., van der Meer, T., & van Elsas, E. (2020). The social basis of political protest voting. Electoral Studies, 66, 102184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102184
Paulis, E., & Ognibene, T. (2023). Protest voting and electoral behavior: A comparative perspective. Electoral Studies, 84, 102650.
Peters, B. G. (2007). Performance-based accountability. Oxford University Press.
Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. University of California Press.
Prianto, A. L., Yuslaini, N., Darmawan, W. B., & Jumroh. (2024). How local democratic backsliding? Single candidate, pragmatism, and uncompetitive local head election in Indonesia. Jurnal Wacana Politik, 9(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v9i2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v9i2.53451
Purwidayani, V., & Slamet, K. (2022). Retrospective voting pada pemilihan kepala daerah di Indonesia: Akuntabilitas keuangan dan kinerja. Jurnal Pajak dan Keuangan Negara, 4(1), 220–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31092/jpkn.v4i1S.1817
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper & Brothers.
Superti, C. (2020). Blank and null voting as political protest. Electoral Studies, 66, 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102168
Van Ryzin, G. G. (2007). Pieces of a puzzle: Linking government performance, citizen satisfaction, and trust. Public Performance & Management Review, 30(4), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576300403 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576300403
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
Yuliati, R., Martani, D., & Siregar, S. V. (2016). Pengaruh akuntabilitas keuangan dan kinerja pemerintah daerah terhadap keterpilihan kembali kepala daerah di Indonesia. Dalam Prosiding Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIX. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.
Dokumen dan Data Resmi
Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Pangkalpinang. (2024). Profil ketenagakerjaan Kota Pangkalpinang 2023.
Komisi Pemilihan Umum. (2024). Peraturan KPU Nomor 19 Tahun 2024 tentang Tahapan dan Jadwal Pemilihan Bupati dan Wakil Bupati serta Wali Kota dan Wakil Wali Kota Ulang Tahun 2025.
Komisi Pemilihan Umum Kota Pangkalpinang. (2024). Rekapitulasi hasil Pemilihan Wali Kota dan Wakil Walikota Pang Kalpinang Tahun 2024.
Pemerintah Kota Pangkalpinang. (2024). Laporan realisasi investasi dan pembangunan daerah Kota Pangkalpinang.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ariandi A Zulkarnain
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author who wishes to publish articles in this journal agree with the following conditions:
- Author retains the copyright and simultaneously provides the journal the first publishing rights of the manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an initial job writing and publishing statement in this journal.
- The author can include in separate additional contractual arrangements for the rich version of non-exclusive distribution of journal publications (eg posting it to the institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with recognition of publishing initially in this journal.
- The author is permitted and encouraged to post their work online (for example: in the institutional repository or on their website) before and during the submission process because it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and more powerful citations of published works. (See open access policy).
