Mengelola Inovasi di Sektor Publik Indonesia: Tinjauan Literatur dan Pengembangan Model UTAUT-IPS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36636/jogiv.v7i2.6896Keywords:
Inovasi Sektor Publik, Keberlanjutan Inovasi, UTAUT-IPS, Behavioral Intention, Adopsi Inovasi, Manajemen Publik IndonesiaAbstract
Public sector innovation plays a critical role in addressing global challenges and enhancing the quality of public services. However, in Indonesia, many public sector innovations lack sustainability and fail to be implemented over the long term. This study aims to identify and analyze the factors influencing the sustainability of pulic sector innovation in Indonesia through a literature review approach. By integrating the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology for Innovation in the Public Sector (UTAUT-IPS), this review maps relationship between internnal factors (such as managerial support, innovation characteristics, and users’ behavioral intention) and external factors (such as political pressure and cross-sector collaboration) in shaping innovation sustainability. The analysis demonstrates that UTAUT-IPS model offers a comprehensive conceptual framework for understanding and designing strategies to sustain innovation in the public sector. This study contributes theoretically to the development of innovation aadoption and sustainability models, and offers strategic insights for policymakers and public sector practitioners in Indonesia.
References
Alzarooni, A. I., Alhashmi, S. M., Lataifeh, M., & Rice, J. (2024). Navigating Digital Transformation in the UAE: Benefits, Challenges, and Future Directions in the Public Sector. Computers, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/computers13110281
Andersen, S. C., & Jakobsen, M. L. (2018). Political Pressure, Conformity Pressure, and Performance Information as Drivers of Public Sector Innovation Adoption. International Public Management Journal, 21(2), 213–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1425227
Badan Strategi Kebijakan Dalam Negeri. (2019, December). RPJMN 2020-2024: Targetkan Daerah dengan Indeks Inovasi Tinggi 36% – BSKDN. https://bskdn.kemendagri.go.id/website/rpjmn-2020-2024-targetkan-daerah-dengan-indeks-inovasi-tinggi-36/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Bankins, S., Denness, B., Kriz, A., & Molloy, C. (2017). Innovation Agents in the Public Sector: Applying Champion and Promotor Theory to Explore Innovation in the Australian Public Service. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 76(1), 122–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12198
Bekkers, V., Jurian, E., & Steijn, B. (2011). Innovation in the Public Sector (V. Bekkers, J. Edelenbos, & B. Steijn, Eds.). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307520
Borins, S. (2000). 46 / What Border? Public Management Innovation in the United States and Canada What Border? Public Management Innovation in the United States and Canada. In Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (Vol. 19, Issue 1).
Chomistriana, D., Mulyono, A. T., & Najid. (2024). Predicting Adoption Behaviour to Digital Government Transformation in Construction Sector. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 29(2), 181–205. https://doi.org/10.21315/JCDC-12-23-0177
Cinar, E., Trott, P., & Simms, C. (2021). An international exploration of barriers and tactics in the public sector innovation process. Public Management Review, 23(3), 326–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1668470
Clausen, T. H., Demircioglu, M. A., & Alsos, G. A. (2020). Intensity of innovation in public sector organizations: The role of push and pull factors. Public Administration, 98(1), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12617
Cobian, K. P., & Ramos, H. V. (2021). A cross-case analysis of developing program sustainability and institutionalization in early stages of a multisite biomedical student diversity initiative. BMC Medical Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02663-2
Criado, J. I., Alcaide-Muñoz, L., & Liarte, I. (2023). Two decades of public sector innovation: building an analytical framework from a systematic literature review of types, strategies, conditions, and results. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2254310
De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
Demircioglu, M. A. (2021). Sources of Innovation, Autonomy, and Employee Job Satisfaction in Public Organizations. Public Performance and Management Review, 44(1), 155–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1820350
Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi. (2024, February 1). Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi - Perkuat Keberlanjutan Kualitas dan Replikasi Inovasi, Pelaksanaan KIPP Tahun 2024 Ditiadakan. https://menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/perkuat-keberlanjutan-kualitas-dan-replikasi-inovasi-pelaksanaan-kipp-tahun-2024-ditiadakan
Korac, S., Saliterer, I., & Walker, R. M. (2017). Analysing the environmental antecedents of innovation adoption among politicians and public managers. Public Management Review, 19(4), 566–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1200119
Lang, M., & Molloy, L. (2013). An Investigation into the Factors which Influence the Adoption of Green IT: A Case Study of an Irish Public Sector Organisation. IGI Global, 200–207. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1972-2.ch012
Lapuente, V., & Suzuki, K. (2020). Politicization, Bureaucratic Legalism, and Innovative Attitudes in the Public Sector. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 454–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13175
Lyver, M. J., & Lu, T. J. (2018). Sustaining innovation performance in SMEs: Exploring the roles of strategic entrepreneurship and IT capabilities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020442
Mawangi, G. T. (2024, October 15). H-5 pelantikan, ini 17 program prioritas Prabowo-Gibran - ANTARA News. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/4398373/h-5-pelantikan-ini-17-program-prioritas-prabowo-gibran?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Mazzarol, T., & Reboud, S. (n.d.). Entrepreneurship and Innovation. http://www.springer.com/series/10099
Momani, A. M. (2020). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A new approach in technology acceptance. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development, 12(3), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSKD.2020070105
Open Government in Indonesia. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1787/ISBN
Peralta, A., & Rubalcaba, L. (2021). How governance paradigms and other drivers affect public managers’ use of innovation practices. A pls-sem analysis and model. Mathematics, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9091055
Pradana, I. P. Y. B., Susanto, E., & Kumorotomo, W. (2022a). Analyzing the critical factors for innovation sustainability in the public sector: evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 35(7), 733–748. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-02-2022-0044
Pradana, I. P. Y. B., Susanto, E., & Kumorotomo, W. (2022b). Bibliometric Analysis of Public Sector Innovation. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 25(3), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.69862
Pratama, A. B. (2020). The landscape of public service innovation in Indonesia: A comprehensive analysis of its characteristic and trend. Innovation and Management Review, 17(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-11-2018-0080
Sang, S., Lee, J. D., & Lee, J. (2009). An empirical study on the determinants of user acceptance of e-Government in public sector. WEBIST 2009 - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, 540–545. https://doi.org/10.5220/0001839905400545
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration and Society, 43(8), 842–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711418768
Thøgersen, D., Waldorff, S. B., & Steffensen, T. (2021). Public Value through Innovation: Danish Public Managers’ Views on Barriers and Boosters. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(14), 1264–1273. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1750030
van Acker, W., & Bouckaert, G. (2018). What makes public sector innovations survive? An exploratory study of the influence of feedback, accountability and learning. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317700481
Venkatesh, V., Walton, S. M., & Thong, J. Y. L. (2012). Quarterly Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology1. https://doi.org/10.5220/0001839905400545
Walker, R. M. (2014). Internal and External Antecedents of Process Innovation: A review and extension. Public Management Review, 16(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.771698
Widodo, S., Marpaung, Z. S., & Santoso, A. D. (2022). What Makes Public Sector Innovation Sustainable?: A Case Study from Indonesia. TEM Journal, 11(3), 1376–1384. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM113-48
Wynen, J., Boon, J., Kleizen, B., & Verhoest, K. (2020). How Multiple Organizational Changes Shape Managerial Support for Innovative Work Behavior: Evidence From the Australian Public Service. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(3), 491–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X18824388
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ahmad Bramantyo Nursasotyosidi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author who wishes to publish articles in this journal agree with the following conditions:
- Author retains the copyright and simultaneously provides the journal the first publishing rights of the manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an initial job writing and publishing statement in this journal.
- The author can include in separate additional contractual arrangements for the rich version of non-exclusive distribution of journal publications (eg posting it to the institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with recognition of publishing initially in this journal.
- The author is permitted and encouraged to post their work online (for example: in the institutional repository or on their website) before and during the submission process because it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and more powerful citations of published works. (See open access policy).
