Audit Energi Pada Gedung Universitas Pertamina Menggunakan Metode AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process)

Muhamad FE  Nugroho; Wahyu Agung  Pramudito; Soni Prayogi

doi:10.33379/icom.v4i2.4379

Penulis

Muhamad FE Nugroho Universitas Pertamina, Indonesia
Wahyu Agung Pramudito Universitas Pertamina, Indonesia
Soni Prayogi Universitas Pertamina, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33379/icom.v4i2.4379

Kata Kunci:

Audit Energi, Efisiensi Energi, Metode AHP, Penghematan Energi

Abstrak

Efisiensi energi di sektor pendidikan sangat penting untuk mengurangi biaya operasional dan dampak lingkungan. Gedung Universitas Pertamina, sebagai konsumen energi signifikan, memerlukan audit energi untuk mengidentifikasi peluang penghematan. Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dipilih untuk menentukan prioritas tindakan efisiensi energi secara objektif dan terstruktur. Audit ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan performa energi gedung, mendukung keberlanjutan, dan mengurangi emisi gas rumah kaca, sekaligus menjadi model bagi institusi pendidikan lainnya dalam pengelolaan energi yang efektif dan berkelanjutan. Proses audit ini melibatkan identifikasi dan analisis konsumsi energi pada berbagai fasilitas gedung, serta penentuan prioritas tindakan efisiensi energi yang dapat diimplementasikan. Metode AHP digunakan untuk memfasilitasi pengambilan keputusan dengan membandingkan berbagai kriteria dan alternatif tindakan secara sistematis dan objektif. Hasil audit menunjukkan bahwa terdapat beberapa area dengan potensi penghematan energi yang signifikan, seperti sistem pencahayaan, pendingin udara, dan penggunaan peralatan listrik. Rekomendasi yang dihasilkan meliputi penerapan teknologi hemat energi, optimalisasi operasional peralatan, serta edukasi dan pelatihan bagi pengguna gedung mengenai praktik hemat energi. Implementasi hasil audit ini diharapkan dapat meningkatkan efisiensi energi di Gedung Universitas Pertamina, mengurangi biaya operasional, dan berkontribusi pada upaya pelestarian lingkungan.

Referensi

Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Aaboen, L., Cova, B., & Rolfsen, A. (2018). Building B2B relationships via initiation contributors: Three cases from the Norwegian-South Korean international project business. Industrial Marketing Management, 68, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.09.027

Alkahtani, M., Al-Ahmari, A., Kaid, H., & Sonboa, M. (2019). Comparison and evaluation of multi-criteria supplier selection approaches: A case study. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 11(2), 1687814018822926. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018822926

Amid, A., Ghodsypour, S. H., & O’Brien, C. (2011). A weighted max–min model for fuzzy multi-objective supplier selection in a supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.04.044

Avery, S. L., Swafford, P., & Prater, E. L. (2014). Impact of supplier relationship management practices on buying firm performance: Comparison of the United States and China. Operations Management Research, 7(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-014-0087-8

Bals, L., & Turkulainen, V. (2021). Integration of the buyer–supplier interface for Global sourcing. Operations Management Research, 14(3), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-021-00205-z

Brito, R. P., & Miguel, P. L. S. (2017). Power, Governance, and Value in Collaboration: Differences between Buyer and Supplier Perspectives. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(2), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12134

Bruno, G., Esposito, E., Genovese, A., & Passaro, R. (2012). AHP-based approaches for supplier evaluation: Problems and perspectives. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 18(3), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2012.05.001

Butt, A. S. (2019). Absence of personal relationship in a buyer-supplier relationship: Case of buyers and suppliers of logistics services provider in Australia. Heliyon, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01799

Craighead, C. W., Ketchen Jr., D. J., & Darby, J. L. (2020). Pandemics and Supply Chain Management Research: Toward a Theoretical Toolbox*. Decision Sciences, 51(4), 838–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12468

dos Santos, B. M., Godoy, L. P., & Campos, L. M. S. (2019). Performance evaluation of green suppliers using entropy-TOPSIS-F. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.235

Erlangga, A. P. M., Dinatha, K. S. K., Nainggolan, F. E., & Prayogi, S. (2023). Prototipe Otomatisasi dan Pemantauan Sistem Hidroponik Berbasis IoT dengan Pemanfaatan Solar Panel Sebagai Sumber Energi. G-Tech: Jurnal Teknologi Terapan, 7(4), 1367–1377. https://doi.org/10.33379/gtech.v7i4.3143

Garzon, F. S., Enjolras, M., Camargo, M., & Morel, L. (2019). A green procurement methodology based on Kraljic Matrix for supplier`s evaluation and selection: A case study from the chemical sector. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 20(3), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2019.1622446

Gelderman, C. J., Semeijn, J., & Verhappen, M. (2020). Buyer opportunism in strategic supplier relationships: Triggers, manifestations and consequences. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 26(2), 100581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2019.100581

Ghadimi, P., Wang, C., Lim, M. K., & Heavey, C. (2019). Intelligent sustainable supplier selection using multi-agent technology: Theory and application for Industry 4.0 supply chains. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 127, 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.050

Ghufron, S., & Prayogi, S. (2023). Cooling System in Machine Operation at Gas Engine Power Plant at PT Multidaya Prima Elektrindo. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business (RIGGS), 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v1i2.21

Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., & Murugesan, P. (2015). Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.046

Irfan, M., Wang, M., & Akhtar, N. (2019). Impact of IT capabilities on supply chain capabilities and organizational agility: A dynamic capability view. Operations Management Research, 12(3), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-019-00142-y

Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi, S., Dodkanloi Milan, M., & Jahangoshai Rezaee, M. (2018). Evaluation and selection of sustainable suppliers in supply chain using new GP-DEA model with imprecise data. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 14(3), 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-017-0246-2

Li, G., Fan, H., Lee, P. K. C., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2015). Joint supply chain risk management: An agency and collaboration perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.02.021

Muhammad, M., Ragadita, B., Prayogi, S., & Saminan, S. (2023). Design of an optical rotation value measurement tool using an arduino device. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 18(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v18i5.4811

Polat, G., Eray, E., & Bingol, B. N. (2017). An integrated fuzzy MCGDM approach for supplier selection problem. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 23(7), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1343201

Prayogi, S. (2022). Analisis Efisisensi Sel Surya a-Si:H Berdasarkan Penyusun Lapisan Aktif. Jurnal Rekayasa Bahan Alam Dan Energi Berkelanjutan, 6(2), Article 2.

Prayogi, S. (2023a). Karakteristik Sel Surya Polikristal Pada Sistem Sun Simulator Menggunakan Lampu Halogen Bulm. G-Tech: Jurnal Teknologi Terapan, 7(1), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.33379/gtech.v7i1.1929

Prayogi, S. (2023b). Thin Layer Deposition of a-Si: H n-Type Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon using PECVD. Journal of Science and Informatics for Society (JSIS), 1(1), Article 1.

Prayogi, S., Muhammad, Abdillah, M., Marzuki, M. I., Wibowo, W. K., Roffi, T. M., Pramudito, W. A., Nugroho, H., Pertiwi, N. I., & Nugroho, T. A. (2023). Pemanfaatan Virtual Laboratory dalam Pehamaman Fisika Siswa SMA Al Manar Azhari Depok. I-Com: Indonesian Community Journal, 3(2), 862–868. https://doi.org/10.33379/icom.v3i2.2679

Prayogi, S., Silviana, F., & Saminan, S. (2023). Resistor and Capacitor Time Constant Measuring Instrument Using Arduino UNO. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 12(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v12i1.15323

Ramadhan, R. A., Kakke, G. R., Fajar, I. N., & Prayogi, S. (2023). Smart Trash Bin Berbasis Internet Of Things Menggunakan Suplai dari Panel Surya. G-Tech: Jurnal Teknologi Terapan, 7(3), 1149–1158. https://doi.org/10.33379/gtech.v7i3.2777

Saaty, T. L. (2001). Analytic hierarchy process. In S. I. Gass & C. M. Harris (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science (pp. 19–28). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-0611-X_31

Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2001). The Seven Pillars of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In T. L. Saaty & L. G. Vargas (Eds.), Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (pp. 27–46). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1665-1_2

Zainuddin, Z., Syukri, M., Prayogi, S., & Luthfia, S. (2022). Implementation of Engineering Everywhere in Physics LKPD Based on STEM Approach to Improve Science Process Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 10(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i2.23130