Energy Audit of Pertamina University Buildings Using the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) Method

Authors

  • Muhamad FE Nugroho Universitas Pertamina, Indonesia
  • Wahyu Agung Pramudito Universitas Pertamina, Indonesia
  • Soni Prayogi Universitas Pertamina, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33379/icom.v4i2.4379

Keywords:

Audit Energi, Efisiensi Energi, Metode AHP, Penghematan Energi

Abstract

This service aims to conduct an energy audit at the Pertamina University Building using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. This audit process involves identifying and analyzing energy consumption in various building facilities, as well as determining priorities for energy efficiency measures that can be implemented. The AHP method is used to facilitate decision making by comparing various criteria and alternative actions systematically and objectively. The audit results show that there are several areas with significant energy savings potential, such as lighting systems, air conditioning and the use of electrical equipment. The resulting recommendations include the implementation of energy-saving technology, optimizing equipment operations, as well as education and training for building users regarding energy-saving practices. Implementation of the results of this audit is expected to increase energy efficiency in the Pertamina University Building, reduce operational costs, and contribute to environmental conservation efforts.

References

Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Aaboen, L., Cova, B., & Rolfsen, A. (2018). Building B2B relationships via initiation contributors: Three cases from the Norwegian-South Korean international project business. Industrial Marketing Management, 68, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.09.027

Alkahtani, M., Al-Ahmari, A., Kaid, H., & Sonboa, M. (2019). Comparison and evaluation of multi-criteria supplier selection approaches: A case study. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 11(2), 1687814018822926. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018822926

Amid, A., Ghodsypour, S. H., & O’Brien, C. (2011). A weighted max–min model for fuzzy multi-objective supplier selection in a supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.04.044

Avery, S. L., Swafford, P., & Prater, E. L. (2014). Impact of supplier relationship management practices on buying firm performance: Comparison of the United States and China. Operations Management Research, 7(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-014-0087-8

Bals, L., & Turkulainen, V. (2021). Integration of the buyer–supplier interface for Global sourcing. Operations Management Research, 14(3), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-021-00205-z

Brito, R. P., & Miguel, P. L. S. (2017). Power, Governance, and Value in Collaboration: Differences between Buyer and Supplier Perspectives. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(2), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12134

Bruno, G., Esposito, E., Genovese, A., & Passaro, R. (2012). AHP-based approaches for supplier evaluation: Problems and perspectives. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 18(3), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2012.05.001

Butt, A. S. (2019). Absence of personal relationship in a buyer-supplier relationship: Case of buyers and suppliers of logistics services provider in Australia. Heliyon, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01799

Craighead, C. W., Ketchen Jr., D. J., & Darby, J. L. (2020). Pandemics and Supply Chain Management Research: Toward a Theoretical Toolbox*. Decision Sciences, 51(4), 838–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12468

dos Santos, B. M., Godoy, L. P., & Campos, L. M. S. (2019). Performance evaluation of green suppliers using entropy-TOPSIS-F. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.235

Erlangga, A. P. M., Dinatha, K. S. K., Nainggolan, F. E., & Prayogi, S. (2023). Prototipe Otomatisasi dan Pemantauan Sistem Hidroponik Berbasis IoT dengan Pemanfaatan Solar Panel Sebagai Sumber Energi. G-Tech: Jurnal Teknologi Terapan, 7(4), 1367–1377. https://doi.org/10.33379/gtech.v7i4.3143

Garzon, F. S., Enjolras, M., Camargo, M., & Morel, L. (2019). A green procurement methodology based on Kraljic Matrix for supplier`s evaluation and selection: A case study from the chemical sector. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 20(3), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2019.1622446

Gelderman, C. J., Semeijn, J., & Verhappen, M. (2020). Buyer opportunism in strategic supplier relationships: Triggers, manifestations and consequences. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 26(2), 100581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2019.100581

Ghadimi, P., Wang, C., Lim, M. K., & Heavey, C. (2019). Intelligent sustainable supplier selection using multi-agent technology: Theory and application for Industry 4.0 supply chains. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 127, 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.050

Ghufron, S., & Prayogi, S. (2023). Cooling System in Machine Operation at Gas Engine Power Plant at PT Multidaya Prima Elektrindo. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business (RIGGS), 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v1i2.21

Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., & Murugesan, P. (2015). Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.046

Irfan, M., Wang, M., & Akhtar, N. (2019). Impact of IT capabilities on supply chain capabilities and organizational agility: A dynamic capability view. Operations Management Research, 12(3), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-019-00142-y

Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi, S., Dodkanloi Milan, M., & Jahangoshai Rezaee, M. (2018). Evaluation and selection of sustainable suppliers in supply chain using new GP-DEA model with imprecise data. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 14(3), 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-017-0246-2

Li, G., Fan, H., Lee, P. K. C., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2015). Joint supply chain risk management: An agency and collaboration perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.02.021

Muhammad, M., Ragadita, B., Prayogi, S., & Saminan, S. (2023). Design of an optical rotation value measurement tool using an arduino device. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 18(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v18i5.4811

Polat, G., Eray, E., & Bingol, B. N. (2017). An integrated fuzzy MCGDM approach for supplier selection problem. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 23(7), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1343201

Prayogi, S. (2022). Analisis Efisisensi Sel Surya a-Si:H Berdasarkan Penyusun Lapisan Aktif. Jurnal Rekayasa Bahan Alam Dan Energi Berkelanjutan, 6(2), Article 2.

Prayogi, S. (2023a). Karakteristik Sel Surya Polikristal Pada Sistem Sun Simulator Menggunakan Lampu Halogen Bulm. G-Tech: Jurnal Teknologi Terapan, 7(1), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.33379/gtech.v7i1.1929

Prayogi, S. (2023b). Thin Layer Deposition of a-Si: H n-Type Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon using PECVD. Journal of Science and Informatics for Society (JSIS), 1(1), Article 1.

Prayogi, S., Muhammad, Abdillah, M., Marzuki, M. I., Wibowo, W. K., Roffi, T. M., Pramudito, W. A., Nugroho, H., Pertiwi, N. I., & Nugroho, T. A. (2023). Pemanfaatan Virtual Laboratory dalam Pehamaman Fisika Siswa SMA Al Manar Azhari Depok. I-Com: Indonesian Community Journal, 3(2), 862–868. https://doi.org/10.33379/icom.v3i2.2679

Prayogi, S., Silviana, F., & Saminan, S. (2023). Resistor and Capacitor Time Constant Measuring Instrument Using Arduino UNO. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 12(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v12i1.15323

Ramadhan, R. A., Kakke, G. R., Fajar, I. N., & Prayogi, S. (2023). Smart Trash Bin Berbasis Internet Of Things Menggunakan Suplai dari Panel Surya. G-Tech: Jurnal Teknologi Terapan, 7(3), 1149–1158. https://doi.org/10.33379/gtech.v7i3.2777

Saaty, T. L. (2001). Analytic hierarchy process. In S. I. Gass & C. M. Harris (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science (pp. 19–28). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-0611-X_31

Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2001). The Seven Pillars of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In T. L. Saaty & L. G. Vargas (Eds.), Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (pp. 27–46). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1665-1_2

Zainuddin, Z., Syukri, M., Prayogi, S., & Luthfia, S. (2022). Implementation of Engineering Everywhere in Physics LKPD Based on STEM Approach to Improve Science Process Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 10(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i2.23130

Published

2024-06-03

How to Cite

Energy Audit of Pertamina University Buildings Using the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) Method. (2024). I-Com: Indonesian Community Journal, 4(2), 761-772. https://doi.org/10.33379/icom.v4i2.4379

Most read articles by the same author(s)