REVIEW GUIDELINES

General

  • Mark the wrong part or parts that need to be changed
  • Put a mark on the right side of the wrong line or lines that need to be changed

Details

  • Title: Effectiveness, Specifications and Clarity
  • Abstract: Complete and describe the essence of the article
  • Keywords: Describing the important concepts of the article
  • Introduction: Up-to-date, originality, Topic relevance, compatibility of important reasons of research object
  • Research Methods: Must emphasize procedures and data analysis for empirical studies
  • Result: Analysis accuracy
  • Findings: Recent findings, relevance to interrelated researchers, and scientific contributions of discoveries/ideas for the development of science
  • Conclusion: Logical, valid, concise, and clear
  • Suggestion: For practical action, new theory development, and further/advanced research
  • Figure / Table: Center located, Uncropped, Good quality to look at, Figure / table title, Capitalized referenced
  • Bibliography: Up-to-date degrees and references to major book sources. Rules: minimum 80% of related scientific journals or researchers, above 2007 (years); minimum number of book sources is 10; 80% minimum in text/art material.

Full Manuscript Review Process

  • Writing: Is the script easy to follow, that is, has a clear logical progression and organization?
  • Is the script concise and easy to understand?
  • Any parts that need to be subtracted, removed/expanded/added?
  • Watch for major problems with the mechanics: grammar, punctuation, spelling. (If there are only a few places that aren't pronounced properly or correctly, make notes to let the author know of specific places.
  • If there are consistent issues across, only select an example or two if necessary - don't try and edit all of them).
  • Abbreviations: Used wisely and arranged in such a way that the reader will have no trouble remembering what the abbreviations represent.
  • Follow the style, format and other rules of the journal.
  • Citation is provided when providing evidence-based information from outside sources.

Category Decision
Publish: No Revision Needed
Minor: Revisions can be made by the Editor-In-Chief or those who assist
Major: Revisions can only be made by the author
Rejected: Unscientific or too much in one issue