The Influence of Supervision on Work Productivity of the Inspectorate Office of Kediri Regency

Authors

  • Sinollah Sinollah Universitas Islam Raden Rahmat
  • Hermawanto Hermawanto Universitas Islam Raden Rahmat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36636/dialektika.v5i1.408

Keywords:

Performance Appraisal, Job Satisfaction, Structural Employee Performance

Abstract

This study aims to: 1) To analyze the effect of performance appraisal on employee job satisfaction; 2). To analyze the effect of performance appraisal on employee performance, and 3). To analyze the effect of job satisfaction on the performance of structural employees receiving performance benefits at the Malang Regency Ministry of Religion. To achieve this goal, this research uses descriptive research type with quantitative approach and the questionnaire becomes the main instrument in data collection. The results of the study using path analysis showed that: 1). Performance appraisal variable has no significant effect on employee job satisfaction; 2). Performance appraisal variables affect employee performance, and 3). Job satisfaction variable has a significant effect on employee performance. For this reason, the Ministry of Religion is suggested to be able to implement a performance appraisal program well for employees so that employees can feel the benefits as feedback about various things such as abilities, strengths, weaknesses, and potential which in turn is beneficial for their performance. In addition, performance is something important that is influenced by satisfaction, for that employee job satisfaction is well guarded through an objective performance appraisal.

References

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2007. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Belonio, Rochelle Joy, 2012, “The Effect of Leadership Style On Employee Satisfaction and Performance of Bank Employess in Bangkok”, Journal of MBA Stamford International University.

Darehzereshki, M. 2013. Effect of Performance Appraisal Quality on Job Satisfaction in Multinational Companies in Malaysia, International Journal of Enterprise Computing and Business Systems, 2(1).

Dessler, Gary. 2006. Human Resource Management. 10th ed. Edisi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Indeks.

Ekasari, Pratiwi. 2010. Pengaruh Insentif dan Penilaian Kinerja Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Pegawai pada PT. Pertamina (Persero) Region I Medan. Thesis Magister Ilmu Manajemen. Universitas Sumatera Utara. Medan.

Euene Mckenna dan Nic Beech. 2000. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Gomes, Faustino Cardoso, 2001. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Kedua, Andi, Yogyakarta.

Ghozali, Imam. 2009. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Edisi Keempat. Semarang: BP-Universitas Diponegoro.

Hakim, A. dan Kumadji, S. 1998. Pengantar Statistika. Surabaya: CV. Citra Media.

Handoko T. Hani. 1998. Manajemen. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Hariandja, Marihot Tua Efendi. (2002). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Pengadaan, Pengembangan, Pengkompensasian, dan Peningkatan Produktivitas Pegawai. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Hasibuan, Malayu SP. 2003. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Hasibuan, Malayu SP. 2005. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi revisi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Hasibuan, Malayu SP. 2007. Organisasi Motivasi. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Indrawati, 2013, “Pengaruh Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai dan Kepuasan Pelanggan Pada Rumah Sakit Swasta di Kota Denpasar”, Jurnal Universitas Udayana. Volume 17. No. 2.

Januari, Cindi Ismi, Hamidah Nayati Utami, Ika Ruhana. 2015. PENGARUH PENILAIAN KINERJA TERHADAP KEPUASAN KERJA DAN PRESTASI KERJA (Studi pada Pegawai PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia, Tbk Wilayah Malang).

Kamal, Fahmi. 2018. Pengaruh Penilaian Prestasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan, Studi Kasus Pada PT. Deconey Jakarta. Aktiva–Jurnal Penelitian Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Vol. 2 No. 1 Juli 2018.

Kinicki, Anjelo and R. Kreitner. 2005. Organization Behavior Keys Concepts Skills & Best Practice. Mc. Graw-Hill, New York.

Luthans, Fred. 2009. Organizational Behaviour. 10th ed. Edisi Bahasa Indonesia. Yogyakarta: ANDI.

Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu, 2000, Evaluasi Kinerja SDM, Cetakan Kesatu, Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu. 2005. Evaluasi Kinerja SDM, Cetakan Kedua, Refika Aditama, Bandung

Mangkunegara, A.A. Anwar Prabu. 2006. Evaluasi Kinerja SDM. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Marniati, 2001. Analisis Pengaruh Kepemimpinan dan Budaya Organisasi terhadap Prestasi Kerja dan Pengembangan Karier. Tesis. Malang: Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Brawijaya.

Martoyo, Susilo. 2006. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Mathis, Robert L dan Jhon H. Jackson. 2009. Human Resource Management. Edisi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Michael dkk (2013)

Noe, Raymond A. 2007. Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage. 6th ed. USA: Mc GRaw-Hill.

Veithzal Rivai. 2006. Kepemimpinan dan Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Robbins, Stephen P. 2009. Perilaku Organisasi. Edisi Keduabelas. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Sedarmayanti, 2007, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Cetakan Pertama, Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Simanjuntak, Payman J. 2005. Manajemen dan Evaluasi Kinerja. Jakarta: LPFE UI.

Soeprihanto, John. 2001. Penilaian Kinerja dan Pengembangan Karyawan. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Solimun. 2002. Multivariate Analysis, Structural Equation Modelling (SEM), Lisrel dan Amos (Aplikasi di Manajemen, Ekonomi Pembangunan, Psikologi, Sosial, Kedokteran dan Agrokompleks). Malang: Fakultas MIPA Universitas Brawijaya Malang.

Sudjana. 2002. Teknik Analisis Regresi dan Korelasi bagi Para Peneliti. Bandung: Tarsito.

Sugiyono, 2007, Metode Penelitian Administrasi, Alfabeta, Bandung.

Winardi. 2009. Gaya Kepemimpinan Yang Efektif, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Published

2020-02-10

How to Cite

The Influence of Supervision on Work Productivity of the Inspectorate Office of Kediri Regency. (2020). Dialektika : Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Ilmu Sosial, 5(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.36636/dialektika.v5i1.408

Most read articles by the same author(s)