Structural Performance Assessment of Post-Tensioned PC-U Girders for 25 m and 50 m Industrial Bridge Spans

Authors

  • Kohar Yudoprasetyo Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Sigit Darmawan Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia
  • Ifarrel Rachmanda Hariyanto Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia
  • Moh. Fadhlan Rosyidi Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia
  • Rishma Eka Savaringga Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70609/gtech.v10i4.10869

Keywords:

Structural performance, Post-tensioned PC-U girder, Prestress loss, Multiple span bridge

Abstract

A 380 m industrial bridge connects the JIIPE Industrial Estate to Pulau Segitiga in Gresik, Indonesia. This study evaluates the structural performance of post-tensioned prestressed-concrete U (PC-U) girders for representative 25 m side spans and a 50 m main span using section calculations and three-dimensional SAP2000 analysis. The assessment covers prestressing demand, immediate and time-dependent losses, anchorage-induced principal tensile stress, live-load deflection, and preliminary erection feasibility. Required prestressing forces are 9,278.7 kN and 25,348.7 kN for the 25 m and 50 m girders, respectively. Total prestress losses are 26.1% and 27.6%, below the adopted 28% planning estimate. Maximum principal tensile stresses after anchorage are 2.519 MPa and 2.676 MPa, below allowable values of 2.556 MPa and 2.761 MPa. Live-load deflections are 17.10 mm and 60.35 mm, satisfying the corresponding L/800 limits of 31.25 mm and 62.50 mm. P Preliminary lifting checks indicate that the assumed half-girder lifting configurations are feasible within the adopted crane-chart capacities. Both girder configurations satisfy the structural criteria evaluated in this study under the stated assumptions; however, the 50 m girder governs the serviceability and lifting requirements, utilizing 96.6% of the allowable deflection and approximately 90% of the adopted crane-chart capacity. The lifting assessment represents only a preliminary erection-feasibility screening and does not constitute a final lifting or erection plan. Detailed anchorage-zone design, camber verification, construction-stage analysis, temporary stability assessment, field verification, and project-specific erection planning are therefore required before implementation.

References

Alrasyidi, M. A., Rosyidi, M. F., Yudoprasetyo, K., Al Munawaroh, P., & Anggraini, A. D. N. (2026). Analisis pengaruh lead rubber bearing terhadap kinerja pilar konvensional pada struktur jembatan highway ortotropik dengan non linear time history analysis. Jurnal Bangunan: Teori, Praktik, Penelitian, dan Pengajaran Teknik Bangunan, 31(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.17977/um071v31i12026p1-12

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2020). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications (9th ed.). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

American Concrete Institute. (2019). Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary [ACI 318-19/ACI 318R-19]. American Concrete Institute.

Armin, H., Manalip, H., & Handono, B. D. (2018). Perencanaan balok girder profil I pada jembatan prestressed dengan variasi bentang. Jurnal Sipil Statik, 6(2), 67–74.

ASTM International. (2018). Standard specification for low-relaxation, seven-wire steel strand for prestressed concrete [ASTM A416/A416M-18]. ASTM International.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2016a). Pembebanan untuk jembatan [SNI 1725:2016]. Badan Standardisasi Nasional.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2016b). Perancangan jembatan terhadap beban gempa [SNI 2833:2016]. Badan Standardisasi Nasional.

Birhane, F. N., Kim, S.-I., & Jang, S. Y. (2020). Long-term deflection of prestressed concrete bridge considering nonuniform shrinkage and crack propagation by equivalent load approach. Applied Sciences, 10(21), 7754. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217754 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217754

Bonopera, M., Chang, K.-C., & Lee, Z.-K. (2020). State-of-the-art review on determining prestress losses in prestressed concrete girders. Applied Sciences, 10(20), 7257. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207257 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207257

Breccolotti, M. (2020). Eigenfrequencies of continuous prestressed concrete bridges subjected to prestress losses. Structures, 25, 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.03.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.03.011

Darmawan, M. S., Yudoprasetyo, K., Refani, A. N., Rosyidi, M. F., & Irwansyah. (2026). Case study of the effect of soil structure interaction on marine jetty performance subjected to corrosion. International Journal of GEOMATE, 30(141), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.21660/2026.141.5385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21660/2026.141.5385

Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga. (2021). Panduan praktis perencanaan teknis jembatan [No. 02/M/BM/2021]. Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat.

Hidayati, N., Hariyadi, & Anggraini, Y. (2023). Studi perancangan Jembatan Samota Sumbawa Besar menggunakan beton prategang tipe U-girder. SIGMA: Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 3(2), 32–41.

Irmawan, M., Yudoprasetyo, K., Refani, A. N., Indrasurya, K., & Parwita, D. N. P. A. (2024). The Evaluation of Pipeline Protection Influenced by Causeway Embankment Using the Finite Element Method (FEM). Applied Sciences, 14(11), 4382. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14114382 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app14114382

Jepriani, S., Widosari, G., & Fitriyani, W. (2020). Analisa perbandingan kehilangan prategang girder PCI dan PCU pada Jembatan Mahakam IV sisi Samarinda Kota. Jurnal Inersia, 12(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.46964/inersia.v12i1.561

Jiang, X., Ban, X., Ma, L., Su, Y., Cao, Q., Zhang, Z., & Guo, J. (2022). Prestressed concrete box girder with high-capacity strands—Monitoring and analysis during fabrication. Buildings, 12(7), 911. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12070911 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12070911

Jiang, X., Chen, H., Zhou, Y., Ma, L., Du, J., Zhang, W., & Li, Y. (2023). Transfer length and prestress losses of a prestressed concrete box girder with 18 mm straight strands. Buildings, 13(8), 1939. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13081939 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13081939

Wang, J., & Kim, Y. J. (2022). A state-of-the-art review of prestressed concrete tub girders for bridge structures. Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience, 3, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43065-022-00058-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43065-022-00058-1

Wicaksana, S., Bali, I., & Hariandja, B. (2024). Partial stressing method effectiveness in post-tension prestressed concrete systems. JMTS: Jurnal Mitra Teknik Sipil, 7(3), 785–794. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmts.v7i3.29068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24912/jmts.v7i3.29068

Yang, M., Gong, J., & Yang, X. (2020). Refined calculation of time-dependent prestress losses in prestressed concrete girders. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 16(10), 1430–1446. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1712438 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1712438

Yu, Q., Yang, Y., & Ren, Y. (2024). Thermal effects on prestress loss in pretensioned concrete girders. Buildings, 14(8), 2325. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082325

Yudoprasetyo, K., Hariyanto, I. R., Rosyidi, Moh. F., & Al Manwaroh, P. (2026). Aplikasi Teorema Castigliano untuk Analisis Defleksi pada Desain Jembatan Beton Prategang: Pendekatan Metode Energi untuk Evaluasi Kinerja Struktural. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 4(4), 10558–10572. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.5245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.5245

Zhu, J., Meng, Q., Shi, T., & Yang, X. (2023). Long-term deformation analysis of prestressed concrete bridges under ambient thermal and vehicle loads. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 19(11), 1656–1675. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2022.2052909 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2022.2052909

Downloads

Published

2026-10-02

How to Cite

Structural Performance Assessment of Post-Tensioned PC-U Girders for 25 m and 50 m Industrial Bridge Spans. (2026). G-Tech: Jurnal Teknologi Terapan, 10(4), 1495-1504. https://doi.org/10.70609/gtech.v10i4.10869

Most read articles by the same author(s)