Energy Management Assessment through Case Study in Coal Handling System of Coal-Fired Power Plant
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33379/gtech.v8i2.4112Keywords:
Coal Handling System, Lean Six Sigma, SKF, UNIDOAbstract
Coal Handling System (CHS) is the main system of Coal Fired Power Plant (CFPP), managing coal transportation from Vessel by Ship Unloader to coal yard through belt conveyor (BC) and Stacker/Reclaimer (S/R), then transported to Silo, known as forwarding process. CHS involves various large electric motors. The unwisdom of operating these motors would result in wasteful electrical energy consumption. To assess the energy management, United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) provides Energy Management System (EnMS) tools based on ISO 50001 industrial sectors. This tool identifies that operational patterns and maintenance activities have a significant impact on the energy consumption. Technically using Integrated SKF Calculation, applying the scenario of direct replacement conveyor rollers aged more than 2 years by only 30%, saves 103,144.20 kWH per cycle, equal to IDR 102,807,951, rather than replacing rollers when broken only. Meanwhile, Lean Six Sigma concept in increasing cycle performance, could save a monthly 594,984 kWH, equal to IDR 593,044,189.
References
Arthur, C. (2021, November 9). What is an energy management system? United Nations Industrial Development Organization. https://www.unido.org/stories/what-energy-management-system
Aughney, N., & O’Donnell, G. E. (2015). The energy saving opportunity in targeting non-value added manufacturing activities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86, 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.044
Chapra, S. C., & Canale, R. P. (2015). Numerical Methods for Engineer: Seventh Edition. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
Donovan, M. (2014, September 17). PDCA is the Breath of Lean. Lean Enterprise Institute. https://www.lean.org/the-lean-post/articles/pdca-is-the-breath-of-lean/
Holmberg, K. et al. (2017). Global energy consumption due to friction and wear in the mining industry. Tribology International, 115, 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2017.05.010
Kowang, T. O. et al. (2022). Critical success factors for Lean Six Sigma in business school. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 11(1), 280. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i1.21813
Kucuk, S., & Ajder, A. (2022). Analytical voltage drop calculations during direct on line motor starting: Solutions for industrial plants. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(4), 101671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.101671
Kulinowski, P., & Kasza, P. (2014). Belt Conveyors for Bulk Materials Calculations by CEMA: 5th Edition. Department of Mining, Dressing and Transport Machines AGH.
Kuvandikov, O. A., Matkasimova, S. S., & Otajonov, B. O. (2021). Analysis And Calculation Of The Operating Time Of The Conveyor. The American Journal of Engineering and Technology, 03(06), 160–164.
Lepkova, N., Zubka, D., & Jensen, R. L. (2014). Financial Investments for Zero Energy Houses. In Global Sustainable Communities Handbook (pp. 217–253). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397914-8.00010-2
Li, J.-X., Pang, X.-X., & Li, Y.-J. (2017). Research of Dynamic Characteristic of Belt Convey. 3rd Annual International Conference on Mechanics and Mechanic Engineering. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/mme-16/25871473
Machado, T. H., Alves, D. S., & Cavalca, K. L. (2019). Investigation about journal bearing wear effect on rotating system dynamic response in time domain. Tribology International, 129, 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2018.08.004
Montgomery, D. C., Peck, E. A., & Vining, G. (2015). Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis: Fifth Edition. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Mu, Y. et al. (2020). Optimal scheduling method for belt conveyor system in coal mine considering silo virtual energy storage. Applied Energy, 275, 115368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115368
Rathi, R., Kaswan, M. S., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Antony, J., & Cross, J. (2022). Green Lean Six Sigma for improving manufacturing sustainability: Framework development and validation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 345, 131130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131130
RULMECA. (n.d.-a). Belt Conveyor Power Calculation Program. Retrieved 22 March 2024, from https://rulmecacorp.com/bulk-handling-power-calculation-program/
RULMECA. (n.d.-b). Pulleys For Belt Conveyors Bulk Handling. Retrieved 3 February 2024, https://www.rulmeca.com/contenuti/herunterladen/Produktkataloge/Gurttrommeln/Catalogue_Belt_Pulleys_-_RULMECA
Vasić, M., Stojanović, B., & Blagojević, M. (2020). Failure analysis of idler roller bearings in belt conveyors. Engineering Failure Analysis, 117, 104898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104898
Xiaoli, R., Jia, Z., & Ge, R. (2017). Calculation of radial load distribution on ball and roller bearings with positive, negative and zero clearance. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 131–132, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.06.042
Zeng, F., Wu, Q., Chu, X., & Yue, Z. (2015). Measurement of bulk material flow based on laser scanning technology for the energy efficiency improvement of belt conveyors. Measurement, 75, 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.05.041
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ari Hastanto, Berkah Fajar Tamtomo Kiono, Jaka Windarta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
