TOGAF Utilization for Revolutionizing Enterprise Architecture at Labor Intensive Industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70609/gtech.v8i4.5470Keywords:
Enterprise Architecture, Framework, Human Resource Management, TOGAFAbstract
Labor-intensive industries face challenges in optimizing information systems and technology. Disconnected business processes cause scattered data and poor application integration. A structured approach is required to design an enterprise architecture aligning business and IT strategies. This study explores TOGAF implementation in a labor-intensive business in Jakarta, focusing on creating a more efficient architecture. The research provides design recommendations, including human resource management portal enhancements. Using TOGAF and UML, the study successfully created an enterprise architecture addressing business, application, data, and technology needs, improving departmental integration, overall business performance, and service delivery. It effectively bridges IT and business strategies.
References
Agievich, V., & Skripkin, K. (2014). Enterprise Architecture migration planning using the Matrix of Change. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 231–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.264
Alkhatib, G. (2024). Structured Methodologies vs UML Artifacts Revisited: A perspective from a developing country. Procedia Computer Science, 239, 2090–2097. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2024.06.396
Anggraini, N., Binariswanto, & Legowo, N. (2019). Cloud computing adoption strategic planning using ROCCA and TOGAF 9.2: A study in government agency. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 1316–1324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.247
Anjaria, K. (2024). Enhancing sustainability integration in Sustainable Enterprise Resource Planning (S-ERP) system: Application of Transaction Cost Theory and case study analysis. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100243
Atencio, E., Mancini, M., & Bustos, G. (2024). Enterprise architecture approach for project-based organizations modeling, design, and analysis: An ontology-driven tool proposal. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 98, 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2024.04.052
Camatti, J. A., Rabelo, G. M., Borsato, M., & Pellicciari, M. (2020). Comparative study of open IoT architectures with TOGAF for industry implementation. Procedia Manufacturing, 51, 1132–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.159
de Oliveira, K. V., Fernandes, E. C., & Borsato, M. (2021). A TOGAF-based framework for the development of sustainable product-service systems. Procedia Manufacturing, 55(C), 274–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2021.10.039
Dumitriu, D., & Popescu, M. A. M. (2020). Enterprise architecture framework design in IT management. Procedia Manufacturing, 46, 932–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.05.011
Gonçalves, D., Ferreira, L., & Campos, N. (2021). Enterprise architecture for high flexible and agile company in automotive industry. Procedia Computer Science, 181, 1077–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.303
Guritno, S., & Rahardja, U. (2011). Theory and Application of IT Research: Metodologi Penelitian Teknologi Informasi. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=l5pyDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&dq=%5B3%5D%09S.+Guritno+and+U.+Rahardja,+%22Theory+and+application+of+IT+Research:+Metodologi+Penelitian+Teknologi+Informasi,%22+Yogyakarta:+Andi,+2018.&ots=fI7ct7vgiF&sig=heR5dFVa0S44_-kyJ2DyO0ALuF4
Kornyshova, E., & Barrios, J. (2021). Process-oriented knowledge representation of the requirement management phase of TOGAF-ADM: An empirical evaluation. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 2239–2248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.237
Kornyshova, E., & Deneckère, R. (2022). A Proposal of a Situational Approach for Enterprise Architecture Frameworks: Application to TOGAF. Procedia Computer Science, 207, 3493–3500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.408
Kotusev, S., & Kurnia, S. (2021). The theoretical basis of enterprise architecture: A critical review and taxonomy of relevant theories. Journals.Sagepub.Com. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0268396220977873
Maghsoudi, M., & Nezafati, N. (2023). Navigating the acceptance of implementing business intelligence in organizations: A system dynamics approach. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2023.100070
Nyale, D., & Karume, S. (2023). Examining the Synergies and Differences Between Enterprise Architecture Frameworks: A Comparative Review. International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research, 12, 2319–8656. https://doi.org/10.7753/IJCATR1210.1001
Oberle, M., Yesilyurt, O., Schlereth, A., Risling, M., & Schel, D. (2022). Enterprise IT Architecture Greenfield Design Combining IEC 62264 and TOGAF by Example of Battery Manufacturing. Procedia Computer Science, 217, 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.209
Popescu, M., of, A. D.-B. of the T. U., & 2011, undefined. (2011). Value chain analysis in quality management context. Webbut.Unitbv.RoM Popescu, A DascaluBulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Series V: Economic, 2011•webbut.Unitbv.Ro, 4(53). https://webbut.unitbv.ro/index.php/Series_V/article/view/6319
Srinivasan, V., Jain, S., Kwon, W., Bayetti, C., Cherian, A. V., & Mathias, K. (2023). What innovative practices and processes are used to deliver psychosocial care in India? A qualitative case study of three non-profit community mental health organisations. SSM - Mental Health, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2023.100220
Suprapto, D. S., & Wella. (2024). Leveraging TOGAF for Effective Enterprise Architecture Planning in Human Resource Management: A Case Study of A Financial Holding Company. Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science, 11(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.33168/JLISS.2024.0101
Ulmi, U., Putra, A. P. G., Ginting, Y. D. P., Laily, I. L., Humani, F., & Ruldeviyani, Y. (2020). Enterprise architecture planning for enterprise university information system using the TOGAF architecture development method. Iopscience.Iop.Org. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/879/1/012073
Wamema, J., Alunyu, A., Amiyo, M., & Nabukenya, J. (2023). Enterprise architecture requirements for standardising digital health in Uganda’s health system. Health Policy and Technology, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100805
Werner, T., & Lehan, A. (2023). Enterprise Architecture Management (EAM) as a fundamental approach for the digital transformation of the German road infrastructure management. Transportation Research Procedia, 72, 1098–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.11.564
Widyaningsih, N. (2014). Perencanaan arsitektur enterprise menggunakan Togaf versi 9: studi kasus Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu (DKPP). https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/27997
Yustrilia, I. (2012). Perencanaan Arsitektur Enterprise Proses Bisnis di Bagian Sumber Daya Manusia Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Airlangga. https://repository.unair.ac.id/24531/
Zhang, K., & Bu, C. (2024). Top managers with information technology backgrounds and digital transformation: Evidence from small and medium companies. Economic Modelling, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106629
Zhang, W., Chen, X., Mao, J., Ke, F., & Liang, H. (2024). How to select plan in emergency decision-making? A two-stage method with case-based reasoning and prospect theory. Applied Soft Computing, 155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111473
Zhu, H., Chang, S., Chen, B., & Zhu, H. (2024). How does military-civilian integration development influence corporate financial constraints in China? Evidence based on quasi-natural experiments. Economic Analysis and Policy, 81, 1273–1289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2024.02.009
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Juan Richard Harmel, Wella
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
